Sunday, October 30, 2011

Limelight Reviews...


 
Due to some life complications (meaning, yes Kyla *has* a life) I have been unable to get this week's Limelight Reviews post up and running. Please do not fret...we'll be up and running next week. To increase participation and consistency with this meme, however, I've called in a pro. Everyone's favorite Rogue and Paris loving vamp, Louise! Also known as @MonsterMaX3.

We'll be hashing out details throughout the week, but most likely, the meme will be posted up next week on her site at Between the Covers.

Thank you to my faithful followers and participators.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Zombie Guest Post

ZOMBIES  are coming....
............the Zombie Apocalypse will happen. 
Whose side will you be on?


I often feel that we zombies are...misunderstood. I mean, really, there's so much out there about zombies that it must be difficult for you to wade through the crap to find the reality. There's Night of the Living Dead, Jodi Redford's That Voodoo You Do and now there's even The Walking Dead. Unfortunately, the more you people write about us...the more you get things wrong. Here's a small sample of information, just to tempt you over to Starting the Next Chapter

On Monday October 30th, there will be a poll in which you wonderful people will decide who is the badest of them all--ahem, zombies. There will be guest posts all week on all sorts of creepy, night creatures: ghosts, zombies, witches, vampires, werewolves and demons! Stop over, read the posts and vote your little zombie loving heart out. On the 31st Marla will announce the winning creeper (psst...I'm sure that will be me, right?). There will also be a GIVEAWAY.

For more information on Zombies, please stop by Starting The Next Chapter to view my guest post. It is epically awesome. 
 
Special thanks to Kelly, aka @soulswallo for her dedication, creativity and pure awesomeness in creating the poster for my campaign. She is totes made of awesome.  


Sunday, October 23, 2011

Limelight Review #4





Thank you to all of you (ahem, you know who you are) who have already joined my meme! I am having a blast being hostess to this, but I'm trying to figure out how to get more people to join us. In that spirit, I will be highlighting a review each week from another blog. I will then hop over to five other blogs and comment on reviews. So, when you see comments from me, it is in the spirit of the highlighted review! I will add a section soon where bloggers can sign up to have a review highlighted.

This week's highlighted review is from Erika @ Badass Book Reviews (@badassbooksblog) :

Series Review: The Magnus Pack by Shelly Laurenston


The meme will go live every Saturday. Bloggers can then enter their information into the Mr. Linky on Saturday, Sunday or Monday. That gives more people time to get their information in, but provides a time limit.You may begin as soon as other post review links, however, please check back after Monday to see if more have been added. You will have the remainder of the week to pop over to five blogs, read their reviews and leave your comments. Bloggers please be aware that not everyone has read the book you reviewed--if you have spoilers, please tell us!

So, how do you play?
  1. You are not required to follow anyone -- including me, however, if you like the content of another blog, this is a great way to build meaningful connections.
  2. Use the Mr. Linky below to enter your review information and link. Please only enter 1 review per week. I realize some of you post multiple reviews per week (or day), but for this review, please limit to one entry per week. You need to post the link for the actual review not just your blog address, so people don't have to search for the review.
  3. Choose 5 reviews from the list to visit, read the spotlighted review and leave meaningful comments--the types of comments you want left on your blog.
Note: You do NOT need to hop back to blogs that comment on your review. You may if you desire. 

To help us all gravitate towards book reviews that we'd find interesting, please list your information in the following format in the [Your Name] section of the Linky:


Book title, author (genre) -- Your Name

Example:
The Seven Year Witch, Jodi Redford (PNR) -- Kyla Holt
http://kylanovelista.blogspot.com/2011/09/review-seven-year-witch-jodi-redford.html

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Limelight Reviews #3





Thank you to all of you (ahem, you know who you are) who have already joined my meme! I am having a blast being hostess to this, but I'm trying to figure out how to get more people to join us. In that spirit, I will be highlighting a review each week from another blog. I will then hop over to five other blogs and comment on reviews. So, when you see comments from me, it is in the spirit of the highlighted review! I will add a section soon where bloggers can sign up to have a review highlighted.

This week's highlighted review is from Louise @ Between the Covers! And, if you're not following her on Twitter, yet...shame on you. Hop to it: @MonsterMaX3

The meme will go live every Saturday. Bloggers can then enter their information into the Mr. Linky on Saturday, Sunday or Monday. That gives more people time to get their information in, but provides a time limit.You may begin as soon as other post review links, however, please check back after Monday to see if more have been added. You will have the remainder of the week to pop over to five blogs, read their reviews and leave your comments. Bloggers please be aware that not everyone has read the book you reviewed--if you have spoilers, please tell us!

So, how do you play?
  1. You are not required to follow anyone -- including me, however, if you like the content of another blog, this is a great way to build meaningful connections.
  2. Use the Mr. Linky below to enter your review information and link. Please only enter 1 review per week. I realize some of you post multiple reviews per week (or day), but for this review, please limit to one entry per week. You need to post the link for the actual review not just your blog address, so people don't have to search for the review.
  3. Choose 5 reviews from the list to visit, read the spotlighted review and leave meaningful comments--the types of comments you want left on your blog.
Note: You do NOT need to hop back to blogs that comment on your review. You may if you desire. 

To help us all gravitate towards book reviews that we'd find interesting, please list your information in the following format in the [Your Name] section of the Linky:


Book title, author (genre) -- Your Name

Example:
The Seven Year Witch, Jodi Redford (PNR) -- Kyla Holt
http://kylanovelista.blogspot.com/2011/09/review-seven-year-witch-jodi-redford.html

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Edit Reports - Angela James


Ever wanted an inside look at why your manuscript wasn’t acquired? Angela James, Executive editor of Carina Press, frequently tweets some lines from edit reports. I have copied and pasted her tweets below for your reference. The first set are from rejected MSs and the second from acquisitions.
You can follow Angela on Twitter @angelajames, visit her Facebook page or her website.
Rejections:

Frm 2 diff books: "The writing feels choppy and unsophisticated"; "it felt overwritten and excessively dramatic in its prose" #editreport

"little to no tension and I wasn't caught up in the story...the pacing is slow and drags" #editreport

"had one of the most disorienting first chapters I've ever read in a manuscript. I honestly have no idea what happened" #editreport

Frm 2 diff reports: "dramatic and over-the-top" "prologue is so ripe with purple prose" (she included a sample...I agree!) #editreport

"1st chapter was fairly well-written, but not really engaging..." #editreport

"...standard popular trope, didn't sparkle enough in its delivery to make me want to keep reading." #editreport

"This...romance is riddled with errors and cliches." #editreport

"This...romance is okay, but it would need a lot of work and I wasn't engaged enough in the opening pages to want to tackle it." #editreport

"The story was decently written but not engaging." #editreport (seeing a lot of this!)

"The writing is good, but the characters aren't appealing." #editreport

"This...romance is well-written, but the concept itself was just a little too unbelievable for me to suspend disbelief" #editreport

"writing was fairly decent, but the story wasn't compelling enough." #editreport

From diff reports: "She was whiny....not well characterized" "heroine isn't characterized except having X color hair" #editreport

"there's some funny stuff in here, but the setup isn't quite working for me, and the characters sound really young" #editreport

"This...romance plunges you right in the middle of a scene but doesn't really explain it" #editreport (the opposite of info dump!)

"...starts w/ 6 pges of encyclopedic-type entry...cld be a good concept but beginning dragged...had a hard time staying engaged" #editreport

For those just joining #editreport, I'm reading thru 15 freelance editors reports to me on slush they read, & pulling quotes to share w/you

2/2 "There's no action or engaging scenes happening...it's basically a really, really long introduction to each character" #editreport

"prose is overly flowery & dramatic & I didn't make it past 1st few pages. It felt like it was trying too hard to be powerful." #editreport

"...romance is well-written & I really wanted to like it, but frankly didn't like hero. He's a little immature & overreactive. " #editreport

"The romance is falling flat. I don't feel the chemistry between the hero and heroine." #editreport

"it's really well-written, but something about it isn't quite striking me the right way...shld have another editor look at it." #editreport

1/2 "1st few chapters really pulled me in, but then it gets slow-paced & overly flowery." #editreport

2/2 "There are a number of scenes just spent on them having sex, frolicking around, without moving the plot forward." #editreport

"This needs more craft work. The writing is choppy, characters didn't engage me. Lots of telling/info drop." #editreport

We acquire abt 7% of what's submitted. MT @julieinduvall: What's % of manuscripts rejected as opposed to rec'd for acquisition? #editreport

However, we reject abt 40% of what editors send forth for acquisition (so they prbbly send forward another 3 % we don't acquire) #editreport

7% we do acquire also includes repeat authors. If you take them out of mix, we probably acquire 3-4% of slush. #editreport

"starts with a prologue that didn't engage me or make me care about the characters" #editreport

"feels like a first manuscript. Lots of errors, choppy writing, not engaging characters. Didn't make it past first scene." #editreport

@Juliana_Haygert nope, but they still have to submit. And we track all submissions, so it's counted in the total. #editreport


"choppily written, lacks cohesion, and the heroine has a cardboard feel to her. Convoluted plot" #editreport

"conflict lacks heart and emotion, and story is difficult to follow. Author switches point of view every paragraph for a while." #editreport

"writing has an edge, but the storyline is too unbelievable as set up, and the characters are two dimensional" #editreport

1/2 "I was instantly drawn in by the unusual setting and promise of fun, quirky characters...." #editreport

1/2 "...such a disappointment. The description of the book sounded so promising..." #editreport

2/2 "Unfortunately, it wasn’t until page 200 that any of these elements were actualized in the story." #editreport

For the next #editreport, I'm doing something I NEVER do: using a service that allows a long tweet. Really want to show you it entirely!

For the next #editreport, I'm doing something I NEVER do: using a service that allows a long tweet. Really want to show you it entirely!

#editreport "...was initially intrigued by the unusual setting, promise of a wide cast of characters, and the early hints that there is more going on than meets the eye. Yet, the author’s voice was inconsistent. The more I read, the more dated and formal the writing became. There was an overload of exclamation marks and overly dramatic dialogue. And with so much focus on every physical movement, the pace became halting and dragged.

But what was most disappointing were the characters. None of them surpassed being 2D."

"No idea what’s going on. Not even sure what decade this is set in. The 80’s? " #editreport

"Query letter is written for an agent." #editreport (this happens with about 5% of our submissions, actually)

"Inconsistent tense—changes from past to present. Wordy. Opening pages are one giant info dump. " #editreport

"Introduces too many characters w/o distinguishing voice/personality—makes it difficult to tell who is who and their importance" #editreport

"think this would need quite a bit of work—lots of overdescribing. But it could have potential for another editor." #editreport


AQCUISITIONS
"author has fairly clean writing and a classic voice that I just loved...her world-building felt so authentic" #editreport

"suspense elements in the novel work well...pacing clips along...characters have nice chemistry." #editreport

"Adore this series & love working w/author, who is flexible, professional, detailed & can be trusted to deliver a ms on time" #editreport

And in case you were wondering, yes, knowledge of how the author is to work with does bump us one way or other. #editreport

"author’s 1st person voice really suits the character & there’s some good action & energy & hooks in the prologue &1st chapter" #editreport

"is as intricately plotted as a caper, but with the dense world-building and rich descriptions of the best fantasies" #editreport

"unforgettable, unpredictable, larger-than-life characters whose escapades will have you on the edge of your seat" #editreport


Sunday, October 9, 2011

Limelight Reviews #2





Welcome book bloggers, to the Limelight Reviews meme! Limelight Reviews was created in response to a shared desire to garner meaningful comments on the reviews we spend hours sweating over, getting it just right. And then...[crickets]. Enter Limelight Review meme. This is where you all clap widely. Geez. Do I need cue cards?


The meme will go live every Sunday. That gives you all an entire week to pop over to five blogs, read their reviews and leave your comments. Bloggers please be aware that not everyone has read the book you reviewed--if you have spoilers, please tell us!

So, how do you play?
  1. You are not required to follow anyone -- including me, however, if you like the content of another blog, this is a great way to build meaningful connections.
  2. Use the Mr. Linky below to enter your review information and link. Please only enter 1 review per week. I realize some of you post multiple reviews per week (or day), but for this review, please limit to one entry per week. You need to post the link for the actual review not just your blog address, so people don't have to search for the review.
  3. Choose 5 reviews from the list to visit, read the spotlighted review and leave meaningful comments--the types of comments you want left on your blog.
Note: You do NOT need to hop back to blogs that comment on your review. You may if you desire. 

To help us all gravitate towards book reviews that we'd find interesting, please list your information in the following format in the [Your Name] section of the Linky:


Book title, author (genre) -- Your Name

Example:
The Seven Year Witch, Jodi Redford (PNR) -- Kyla Holt
http://kylanovelista.blogspot.com/2011/09/review-seven-year-witch-jodi-redford.html

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Limelight Reviews





Welcome book bloggers, to the Limelight Reviews meme debut! Limelight Reviews was created in response to a shared desire to garner meaningful comments on the reviews we spend hours sweating over, getting it just right. And then...[crickets]. Enter Limelight Review meme. This is where you all clap widely. Geez. Do I need cue cards?


The meme will go live every Sunday. That gives you all an entire week to pop over to five blogs, read their reviews and leave your comments. Bloggers please be aware that not everyone has read the book you reviewed--if you have spoilers, please tell us!

So, how do you play?
  1. You are not required to follow anyone -- including me, however, if you like the content of another blog, this is a great way to build meaningful connections.
  2. Use the Mr. Linky below to enter your review information and link. Please only enter 1 review per week. I realize some of you post multiple reviews per week (or day), but for this review, please limit to one entry per week. You need to post the link for the actual review not just your blog address, so people don't have to search for the review.
  3. Choose 5 reviews from the list to visit, read the spotlighted review and leave meaningful comments--the types of comments you want left on your blog.
Note: You do NOT need to hop back to blogs that comment on your review. You may if you desire. 

To help us all gravitate towards book reviews that we'd find interesting, please list your information in the following format in the [Your Name] section of the Linky:


Book title, author (genre) -- Your Name

Example:
The Seven Year Witch, Jodi Redford (PNR) -- Kyla Holt
http://kylanovelista.blogspot.com/2011/09/review-seven-year-witch-jodi-redford.html

 

A Bakin' up Blogs Design Copyright © 2011 The Blog Bakery

Header Image inspired by Fallen Angel's Pain Vol.1 by Frozen Flame